DOVE E-Promises – Crowdsourced Community of Therapy-by-Chocolate

Share Button

This past week—post-Valentines Day weekend—a (married) coworker discreetly deposited two chocolate wrappers into my trashcan when visiting my cube.  While most reasonable people would ball up the foil before flicking it up, these two happened to be left unwrapped.  I was intrigued, seeing messages on the inside:

DOVE E-Promise 1DOVE E-Promise 2

I was curious what the source of the messages were.  Was this Maya Angelou?  E. L. James?  Shakespeare?  Of what source might other intellectual treasures behold the seeker of such wisdom?

After a quick search, I happened to stumble across what was the source data for Dove’s website, that was linked to the main interactive page for all of the Dove E-Promises messages displayed their wrappers.  What was fun about this discovery was that included in this data sheet was also a shortened name, as well as the city that the contributors had apparently submitted these messages from.  Armed with user data, I was excited to see what I could learn from this chocolate community.

Fast-Facts of DOVE E-Promises Campaign

1) 213 chocolate lovers responded to their call.

I have yet to find the original plea for responses by Dove, as there weren’t any relevant messages on either of Dove’s Facebook pages as far back as November 2014, as of mid-August their dedicated Dove Pinterest board already contained these messages, and while I didn’t find anything on their Twitter account either, I couldn’t imagine that a tweet would get that kind of response.

2) 28 states were represented.

While this state count is of unique users, one particular woman in Detroit contributed one full third of responses, a total of 78 messages!  I take it that she is a fan.

3) The top categories of messages were Inspiration, Indulgence, and Attitude.

DOVE E-Promise Contributor Themes

No surprise, chocolate lovers seek inspiration and a moment of indulgence.

There is no surprise that these chocolate lovers would reinforce their supportive community with sought-out inspiration and justified indulgence.  Still, what intrigues me the most is pairing the categories and messages to the regions from where they originated.  Do New Yorkers have different methods of chocolate therapy than their South Carolina cohorts?

What inferences can you deduce about women who love chocolate?  Play with the map, then leave a comment below with any thoughts you have.

Does America Know What We Want?

Share Button

Since summer of 2013, Google has been working on an ambitious goal, called Project Loon: to provide balloon-powered internet for everyone.  Of a couple of worthwhile benefits identified:

  • Farmers: the better weather forecast producers have access to, the more food supply available.
  • Small businesses: by putting businesses online, more opportunities would be made available
  • Ad revenue: the more people online, the more opportunity there is to charge for eyeballs on ads (ideally, for the servicing of needs through effective ads)

I stumbled across a promotional video by Project Loon, showing how they are bringing opportunity through connectivity in a rural area in Brazil:

“This is the only way they’re going to grow, not only as students, but as human beings with the ability to contribute knowledge to their community.”

It struck me: sure, perhaps this is just an idealistic teacher of a small community out in the brush somewhere… but she has vision for her students, and perhaps they have more initiative and hope than we do here in the United States. How dull and uninspired are the majority of Americans? We have so much access to amazing technologies and resulting opportunities, but what are we doing? Do we have an imagination left of what we could contribute?

At least from what I can gather, it seems like our society revolves around immersive entertainment.  I would like to trace how many of my weekly activities are either entertainment, or are me laboring to product some form of entertainment.  But ultimately, what is there at the end of the day other than seeing or learning the way someone else views the world?  Whether through our natural world of the outdoors, pigments to illustrate environments, or through our built world of music or things of the internet, these are all activities of experiencing what is already around us.

Where is the line between experiencing what is already around us and entertainment?  Passiveness.  Does the experience:

  1. Help us pass time
  2. Illuminate our minds
  3. Provide inspiration for our own creativity

May we have more of the last two than the first.

From being surrounded and saturated with tools and methods to contribute to our society, it can be really easy to deflate their value.  But for someone who has never had the experience, we can only imagine the energy around new horizons of possibility.

A Use of the Oculus Rift: Journalism

Share Button

Harvest of Change

This past September, The Des Moines Register developed a news feature on a farming family in Iowa, on how the industry is changing.  Recorded with 360-degree video, it is an innovative and excellent use of the Oculus Rift and the promise of virtual reality.

Unlike in traditional video, while the family head makes remarks VR allows a glance at the rest of the family's joyful reactions.

Unlike in traditional video, while focus is on the family head making remarks, VR allows a glance at the rest of the family’s joyful expressions.

What is beneficial about the medium is because it is immersive, the experience brings out a very personal view of the subjects, and the “news story” carries a lot of empathy. I don’t think that it feels this way simply because it is different from our regular 2D video experiences, but I suspect it is because the ability to look around demands that you must physically direct your attention. In addition to that, being able to look around for additional context can be very enriching as well.

It’s intended to be used with the Oculus Rift, but you can still view the feature on their website with a browser plugin from Unity, or download a package and view it WASD/mouse game-style on a computer.

Lol, where is Johnny off to?

Lol, where is Johnny off to?

Coke Names: For Those Who Drink Young?

Share Button

Earlier this summer, Coca Cola has implemented a recent campaign with 250 names on the labels of their 20-oz bottles. According to their website, the Coca Cola company claims “The campaign, which concludes Aug. 30, features 250 of the most popular names among teens and Millennials on 20-oz. bottles.” In using their name finding tool, my nickname “Jay” was not included in the list, which made sense since I had recently learned on that my name had apparently peaked in usage around the 1960s (though I’m not 50 years old… my legal name John is included, however). This aroused my curiosity, in wondering just how exclusive their name choice was to Millennials, or if their targeting had other intent.

Coke names johnPerhaps for intuitive reasons, the names that Coke chose didn’t include Thelma nor Louise (both peaked usage in the 1910s, would be around 100 years old), however as a Millennial myself I didn’t grow up knowing a Bobby, and I don’t know of any young girls running around with the name Cathy, both of which they did include in their list. How much inclusiveness did Coke decide to have in choosing names for their selective list? Are they only looking for hip young consumers (no bias), or do they actually include something for everyone?

After doing a bit of plugging-and-chugging on this baby name website, I extracted the peak decades for each of the 250 names that Coke included in their list. I added up the frequency of use, and here are the ages that Coke targeted:

coke names age frequency So even though Coke claims to have included popular Millennial names, it seems they have also been inclusive enough to include names of nearly everyone to some degree. Perhaps more specifically, I think that this curve is what I would expect of the ages of people who would drink Coca Cola. However I don’t think that 10% of Coke drinkers are infants, but my hypothesis is that they included some newly-popular name for parents who would want to have a historical collectable for their kids, having their love of Coca Cola forever sealed on a shelf somewhere in their basement or in dad’s man cave.

What would be even more fun to investigate, if possible, would be use of ethnicities in the names chosen, or by demographics in specific North American cities. Apparently this campaign was first launched in Australia in 2011, was in Europe last summer, and I wonder to what degree consumption by age is different in other regions of the world.

Did your name make the list? And are you older or younger than most others with your name? I have included all 250 names here linked with the page on that I used to extract the most commonly used decade. Check out your name’s usage through the years, and see if you may come to a different conclusion than I. Enjoy! And enjoy Coca Cola.

1. Aaron Male 1980
2. Abby Female 2005
3. Adam Male 1980
4. Alejandra Female 1990
5. Alejandro Male 2005
6. Alex Male 1990
7. Ali Female 1970
8. Alicia Female 1980
9. Alisha Female 1980
10. Allie Female 2010
11. Alyssa Female 1990
12. Amanda Female 1980
13. Amber Female 1980
14. Amir Male 2010
15. Amy Female 1970
16. Ana Female 1990
17. Andrea Female 1980
18. Andres Male 2010
19. Andrew Male 1980
20. Angel Female 1970
21. Angela Female 1970
22. Anna Female 2000
23. April Female 1970
24. Ashley Female 1980
25. Asia Female 1990
26. Austin Male 1990
27. Becca Female never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
28. Ben Male 1880
29. Beth Female 1960
30. Blake Male 1990
31. Bobby Male 1930
32. Brad Male 1970
33. Brandon Male 1990
34. Brandy Female 1970
35. Bree Female 1960
36. Brett Male 1980
37. Brian Male 1970
38. Brittany Female 1990
39. Brittney Female 1990
40. Brooke Female 1990
41. Bryan Male 1980
42. Caitlin Female 1990
43. Cameron Male 2010
44. Carlos Male 2010
45. Caroline Female 1990
46. Carrie Female 1970
47. Casey Female 1980
48. Cassandra Female 1990
49. Cathy Female 1950
50. Chad Male 1970
51. Charles Male 1930
52. Chase Male 2010
53. Chelsea Female 1990
54. Chris Male 1960
55. Cierra Female 1990
56. Claudia Female 1990
57. Cody Male 1990
58. Connor Male 2010
59. Corey Male 1980
60. Cory Male 1980
61. Courtney Female 1990
62. Cristina Female 1980
63. Crystal Female 1980
64. Cynthia Female 1950
65. Dana Female 1970
66. Daniel Male 1980
67. Danielle Female 1980
68. Darius Male 1990
69. David Male 1950
70. Deb Female 1950
71. Derek Male 1980
72. Devin Male 1990
73. Dominique Female 1990
74. Dustin Male 1980
75. Dylan Male 2010
76. Edgar Male 1990
77. Eduardo Male 2010
78. Edward Male 1880
79. Emily Female 1990
80. Emma Female 1990
81. Eric Male 1970
82. Erica Female 1980
83. Erika Female 1980
84. Erin Female 1980
85. Ethan Male 2010
86. Evan Male 2010
87. Francisco Male 1990
88. Gabe Male 1880
89. Gabriela Female 2010
90. Garrett Male 1990
91. George Male 1880
92. Greg Male 1960
93. Haley Female 1990
94. Hannah Female 1990
95. Hassan Male 2010
96. Heather Female 1970
97. Hector Male 2010
98. Holly Female 1970
99. Hunter Male 2010
100. Ian Male 2010
101. Ibrahim Male 2010
102. Jack Male 1920
103. Jackie Female 1960
104. Jacob Male 1990
105. Jake Male 2000
106. Jamal Male 1990
107. James Male 1940
108. Jamie Female 1980
109. Janelle Female 1980
110. Jared Male 1980
111. Jasmine Female 1990
112. Jason Male 1970
113. Javier Male 2010
114. Jeff Male 1960
115. Jenna Female 2000
116. Jennifer Female 1970
117. Jeremy Male 1970
118. Jess Female never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
119. Jesse Male 1980
120. Jill Female 1960
121. Joe Male 1930
122. Joel Male 1980
123. John Male 1940
124. Jon Male 1960
125. Jordan Female 1990
126. Jorge Male 2000
127. Jose Male never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
128. Josh Male 1980
129. JR Male never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
130. Juan Male 2000
131. Julia Female 2000
132. Julie Female 1960
133. Justin Male 1980
134. Kara Female 1980
135. Karen Female 1950
136. Karina Female 1990
137. Kate Female 1990
138. Kathy Female 1950
139. Katie Female 1980
140. Kayla Female 1990
141. Keisha Female 1970
142. Keith Male 1960
143. Kelly Male 1960
144. Kelsey Female 1990
145. Ken Male 1960
146. Kendra Female 1980
147. Kevin Male 1960
148. Kim Female 1960
149. Kris Male 1970
150. Kyle Male 1990
151. Latasha Female 1980
152. Latoya Female 1980
153. Laura Female 1960
154. Lauren Female 1980
155. Leah Female 2000
156. Lee Male 1930
157. Leslie Female 1960
158. Linda Female 1940
159. Linds Male never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
160. Lisa Female 1960
161. Liz Female 1960
162. Logan Male 2010
163. Luis Male 2010
164. Luke Male 2010
165. Maddy Female never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
166. Makayla Female 2000
167. Malcolm Male 1920
168. Manuel Male 1920
169. Marcus Male 1980
170. Maria Female 1960
171. Mariam Female 2000
172. Marissa Female 1990
173. Mark Male 1960
174. Mary Female 1920
175. Matt Male 1960
176. Maurice Male 1910
177. Mayra Female 1980
178. Meg Female 1960
179. Mel Male 1940
180. Michael Male 1960
181. Michelle Female 1970
182. Miguel Male 2000
183. Mike Male 1960
184. Miranda Female 1990
185. Mitch Male 1960
186. Monica Female 1970
187. Morgan Male 1990
188. Nadia Female 2000
189. Natalie Female 2000
190. Natasha Female 1980
191. Nate Male never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
192. Nick Male 1910
193. Nicole Female 1980
194. Noor Male 2000
195. Olivia Female 2010
196. Omar Male never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
197. Oscar Male 1890
198. Paige Female 1990
199. Pat Female 1930
200. Paul Male 1960
201. Peter Male 1950
202. Phil Male 1940
203. Rachel Female 1980
204. Ray Male 1920
205. Rebecca Female 1970
206. Ricardo Male 1990
207. Rick Male 1950
208. Rob Male 1960
209. Rosa Female 1930
210. Ryan Male 1980
211. Sam Female never a top-1000 name (you’re special)
212. Sandy Female 1960
213. Sara Female 1980
214. Sarah Female 1970
215. Scott Male 1960
216. Sean Male 1980
217. Seth Male 2000
218. Shane Male 1970
219. Shannon Female 1970
220. Shawn Male 1970
221. Shawna Female 1970
222. Shayla Female 2010
223. Shelby Female 1990
224. Spencer Male 1990
225. Stacy Female 1970
226. Stephanie Female 1980
227. Steve Male 1960
228. Sue Female 1940
229. Sydney Female 2000
230. Syed Female 1970
231. Tamika Female 1970
232. Tara Female 1990
233. Taylor Female 1990
234. Tiara Female 1990
235. Tiffany Female 1980
236. Tim Male 1960
237. Tom Male 1940
238. Tony Male 1960
239. Travis Male 1980
240. Trevor Male 1990
241. Trey Male 2000
242. Tyler Male 1990
243. Vanessa Female 1980
244. Veronica Female 1970
245. Vic Male 1960
246. Wes Male 1960
247. Whitney Female 1980
248. Will Male 1920
249. Yesenia Female 1990
250. Zach Male never a top-1000 name (you’re special)

I am in no way endorsed by the Coca Cola company. All thoughts and opinions are my own.

Don’t Have Time To Learn Fashionable [Programming] Languages? Use PhoneGap!

Share Button

There are really so many different things that are built precariously on top of other systems. This frustration can be compounded if you spend months or years keeping up with fashionable programming languages, and then a new language comes along. But if you just want the same end result, and it is in the long tail of things that aren’t overly specific requiring custom-tailoring, then PhoneGap helps “close the gap” of knowledge required just to simply display a “Hello World” app. And in EVERY environment! (iOS, Android, Blackberry… really, what else do you need?)

Is Product Placement in a Digital Age Bad?

Share Button

ofcom product placement PFor a Consumer Behavior course I am taking over the summer, in our forum discussions we were prompted with a UK regulation from 2010 concerning product placement in British programming. Put into effect in February 2011, the UK regulator Ofcom now permits product placement in programming only with the prominent display of their designated “P” (alliteration unintended) at the beginning of each segment, as a heads up to viewers that there will be product placement at some point during the show.

As a class, we were challenged with discussing why this was an appropriate time for this new regulation to occur, and whether or not it was justified. Working in Price Per Click advertising for a little while, and an active consumer of online content with all of its delights and woes, I feel elated at seeing trends of how online advertising can become more and more precise in how with available data, content can become more and more targeted for a relevant audience. Of course this comes with privacy concerns from borderline intrusive messaging, but as an optimist I think that it is a very bright time both for marketers to share their content and messages, and for consumers to be open to relevant products in their lives.

Is Product Placement Really a Desire of the Public?

From the verbiage in The Independent, their language suggests that lobbying from advertisers pressured the government to allow for product placement for the first time.  This suggests that the prevailing British preference was to not have outside brand messages interfere with the programming that they are watching, and that they see that their goods and services as removed from the experiences they watch in their shows.  This would be the only point of concern, but I think that this regulatory change was implemented in a historic time that makes this concern irrelevant.

For values towards brands outside of the United States, this situation reminded me of a passage I read (written in 1989) about neighborhood businesses called ‘Third Places,’ much like a local Starbucks or neighborhood bar.  In discussing the French culture of cafés, Ray Oldenburg (The Great Good Place) points out that in their concern for the invasion of market forces, they don’t even name many of their local businesses. He more-eloquently describes their dynamic:

“Naming something is the first step toward advertising it, and the French have always been admirably suspicious of advertising—only in recent years have they permitted it on television.  But the major reason for not naming a bistro is simply that the neighborhood café does not need a name.  Its patron has filled a local niche and is content with his small, steady business.”

For the sake of contrast, I would argue that television is fundamentally different.  Television programming spans distance of neighborhoods, and of course now with the internet, we are no longer limited to media catering to the local tastes and desires in the city of our residence.  We are now able to pick and choose the cultures that we desire to reinforce or be influenced by, so theoretically every channel and programming block will only become more and more relevant to particular audiences.

As part of our course outlining literature on self perception through consumption, “symbolic self-completion” theory and the concept of the “extended self” both suggest that “we are what we consume.”  Since I am not very familiar with British culture, I am unable to make assessments on what types of products Britons use and prefer, but given the backlash of at least The Independent, it seems as though the British (at least in 2011) preferred to live the way they did and use the products they already used.  However, assuming that the nature of the networked world will influence consumer behavior in the UK as it has in the United States, these consumers will understand that new possibilities extend past their own local customs and products, and that to a certain extent they already participate in ‘cultural selection’.  Also, assuming that marketers in Britain are conscious of their target markets, then they will find ways to interject their messages only in the places where they will effectively influence those who will be likely to benefit from that messaging and use of their product.  This should not make product placement much less an issue of unwanted obtrusion, and sure enough it seems most of the critical articles on product placement center only around 2011 when this change first occurred.

As one last point of potential contention, there may also be concerns that product placement would start invading every area of life.  From the same article in The Independent, this interjection of product placement is restricted only to programs other than “children’s programmes, news and current affairs, consumer advice and religious programmes made for UK audiences.”  Each of these prohibited spheres I think are reasonable ‘socially sacred‘ mediums where commercial interests are not appropriate and should not influence civic life, and I think that this was a very tactful decision from Ofcom.

‘Product Placement’ Can Now be a Celebrated Thing

So justifying of product placement aside, I think that on the contrary the cultural lifestyles promoted in media is actually welcoming of product placement, just not in the way we traditionally think.  With nearly every human activity revolving around using products that others manufacture, it is arguable that every form of media is some type of advocacy for a certain lifestyle with certain products.  Whether this is overt or covert is one thing, but the line of what products are intentionally promoted and which are accidentally featured is only going to be more and more blurred.


Top Gear, from

More recently in September of 2013, the BBC show Top Gear had inadvertently crossed this line.  As a show that praises the craft and even art of various automobile manufacturers, their use of man-made products is very apparent.  In one episode, brands of seats and harnesses were unintentionally displayed, and following from Ofcom’s 2011 regulation they were penalized for their failure to display the product placement P. In the producer’s words “We have never given them prominence over the years because we have different manufacturers for Star in a Reasonably Priced car.  This slipped under the radar.”  This suggests that his use of brands is so engrained, that their use wasn’t even thought of as product placement in his eyes.

More generally, how often do sophisticated crime/law/government TV shows feature a curiously slim aluminum-and-glass laptop, sans a glowing Apple in the back?  Or banner ads with people using a smartphone with a cover, that has a hole for the camera lens distinctively in the far top-left corner?  To identify with their customers, marketers acknowledge that Apple holds a 41.4% marketshare on smartphones in the US.  And how often have you seen younger models in ads wearing a certain type of plain, dual-paneled canvas shoe (TOMS)?  Or a professional carrying a white coffee cup with green highlights (Starbucks)?  These products are simply part of our culture’s lifestyle, and in connecting with consumers, this is a great chance for marketers to help reinforce what their brand’s culture stands for, and how it can fit in with what their consumers already do.  It is only when a brand is overly blatant about it, or it doesn’t match the environment that product placement seems off-putting and irrelevant, but the ‘invisible hand’ seems to ensure that brand use is done tactfully for the most part, not requiring legislation to prevent its abuse.

There has recently been contention around advertising on Facebook, since it is now grown to such prominence to even be referred to as a ‘social utility.’  But as advertising can get more and more targeted, we will have less and less ads shown to us about mortgage refinancing etc., but will have more relevant ads shown to us.  I think YouTube has already proven that targeting is possible, and most video ads that are presented to me on YouTube I have found to be quite relevant… and in some cases even enjoyable!

As long as we as marketers can find ways to take advantage of Big Data becoming more and more available to us, the more effective we can be… and the less annoying we will be to other consumers by taking them out of our line of fire.

Ideation Occurs In-Person, Make It Your Mission

Share Button

Living a couple blocks away from a downtown, I have begun making strides to take advantage of the surrounding amenities of professional talks, restaurants, and other cultural events that are now all within walking distance. I had a great evening at a Meetup event, where we helped each other move some projects along, and with two other guys we brainstormed and chiseled away at an idea until we conceived not only the concept for an application but the monetization strategy as well!  This back-and-forth ideation is an experience that I’ve grown to cherish, realizing that such high-level discussions fully utilizing college-educated knowledge and sensibilities are not possible in just any arena.

The other of the two guys was an intern from the University of Waterloo, who as a first-generation Indian immigrant.  As we began discussing a team for this new app idea, this ‘director’ from Chicago revealed that he was a one-man shop.  For most of his work, he simply does the design and outsources the rest, as he justifies that it is virtually equivalent work.  The student–of course perhaps being biased, studying computer science–disagreed, responding “I think that the top talent will always be here in the United States.”  “Yeah, maybe the top .001% of talent is here, but for half the price I can get someone in Asia to do it that is still 90% as good.”  What seemed most telling to me however, was that nonetheless he admitted that the concept that we had realized in that 45 minute discussion was better than what he could come up with in four months on his own.

Weird Al Mission Statement synergy ideationPerhaps our great bard of modernity is really onto something, as sarcastic as he is in his new video on company mission statements.  As we are all social creatures, the beauty of being able to seek out others that are working in similar circumstances is that we can shed light on what they don’t know, and in some case we can work together.  Networking soon will bring seamless integration.  We’ll leverage our core competency in order to holistically administrate exceptional… synergy.  (oh just go watch the video, it’s great.)

Another Thought on In-Person Ideation: The Importance of Place

A little while ago, I finished Richard Florida’s book “Who’s Your City?” as a follow-up to his previous book on the emerging ‘creative class.’ His ideas have been bouncing around in my head, as in the past year I have had the opportunity to visit some of the best cities he has highlighted of Omaha, Des Moines, Denver, Boulder, San Francisco, and my current city of Ann Arbor, MI. And seeing a good handful of satellite cities and suburbs in-between, I have had an interesting journey talking with different people and experiencing their different lifestyles, which has been both inspiring yet startling how wide of a spread there is between the cultural engagement of different cities. Over the past year, this passage has become more and more visceral to me:

“To be sure, globalization is powerful.  Places that never had a chance to participate in the world economy are seeing some action.  But not all of them are able to participate and benefit equally. Innovation and economic resources remain highly concentrated.  As a result, the really significant locations in the world economy remain limited in number.


In one analysis, plotted on the y axis is the locations of the most-sited scientists in research.

The reality is that global-ization has two sides.  The first and more obvious one is the geographic spread of routine economic functions such as simple manufacturing or service work (for example, making or answering telephone calls).  The second, less obvious side to globalization is the tendency for higher-level economic activities such as innovation, design, finance, and media to cluster in a relatively small number of locations.”

These two book on the role of place in our new economy have had a profound impact on me, and I am very grateful as it turns out to have selected a university that is in a city near one of these clusters, these “creative centers.”  Unburdened by any other concern, we were able to all experience a bit of self-actualization that night in an exercise of dreaming up what could be.

And as I continue to learn the value of these interactions, I am more and more motivated to carry out my own personal mission statement that I had devised for NYE 2013: To encourage individual and institutional adoption of technologies and processes to minimize barriers of collaboration.

Is Reported Facebook Ad CTR Accurate?

Share Button

This past winter, I helped an organization launch their first campaign fully tagged and tracked in Google Analytics.  This included tagging emails, posts on Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest, select tweets on Twitter, and for the first time experimenting with ads and boosting posts on Facebook and LinkedIn.  Using Google Analytics’ standard reporting for traffic leads from each source, we began to compare efficacy of each medium and adjust efforts put into the campaign.  For the ads however, while the reported CTR was excellent at eventually 2.39% (for the three-month campaign), in comparing reports from Google Analytics with reports from Facebook, we realized that the amount of reported clicks by Facebook was greater by nearly an order of two.  I calculated what the real Facebook ad CTR was from the reported impressions / visits in GA, and found a saddening .092%.  What accounted for this huge discrepancy?

At first, my mind jumped to deceit.  I had watched a pretty compelling experiment done by the YouTube channel Veritasium this February, pointing out the elephant in the room of pages with bloated amounts of ‘likes.’  I am glad to say that I discovered the discrepancy, and while this experiment should be seriously considered in spending large budgets on Facebook (ala General Motors in 2012), the issue ended up being much more benign.

As it turns out, both Facebook and LinkedIn factor in social actions into their CTR calculation.  After revisiting specifically the boosted posts (instead of the ads in the sidebar), I quickly realized what was driving the clicks.  In most of our posts, we clearly displayed a link, however in one post in particular the link was removed and all that was left was the image.  This image was not just pulled from the social graph, but was a literal image that was posted from our social media team.  And what else to do when there is an image with a description?  Click the photo to get the full-screen, theater-box view of the image, of course.

Facebook Ad CTR

Facebook Ad CTR engagement12,533 people (8.01%) didn’t visit our site, unfortunately.  12,533 people saw a giant image and clicked on it, but 24 people clicked on our link that we provided.  We realized that in our workflow, the only data immediately given to me was the CTR straight from Facebook’s report, but after visiting the Facebook page myself the other reported information seemed like a minor oversight to not clearly show in their exported-Excel-sheet report.

So what were the lessons learned from this discovery?

  1. First of all, if you want engagement, use images… just like everyone says.
  2. If you would like site traffic, clearly display a separated link for users to click on.  Nothing intrusive, but intentionally clear.
  3. The farther away you get from the source, the harder it is to know the truth.  An integrated, well-connected team is never a bad thing.

How to Tag A Google Analytics Campaign

Share Button

tagged google analytics campaign

Ready to get started measuring campaigns driving traffic to your site? For each link you put out—whether from email or social media properties—append your link with a query string using Google’s server syntax to identify up to 4 different content parameters of categorization, all of which can be tracked within Google Analytics.  You can find these reports under Acquisition > Campaigns.

What Does Tagging Enable Me To Do?

Think of tagging your campaigns as putting up turnstiles on paths in a park.  But not only do you get a count of how many people used that path, but you also put a stamp on the hand of everyone who comes through, so you can then see what attractions they visited, how long they spent in the park, and even if they bought ice cream.

Google Analytics can already tell you who your referrers are: whether they came from search, a social media platform, another website, or even directly.  But what about that one special announcement that you made?  Campaign tagging allows you to separate out traffic from specific sources, and see specific behavior that you wouldn’t have been able to observe before.

With this knowledge, you can evaluate landing page performance not in general, but from a specific set of ad copy.  You can track one Facebook link post versus just a picture, and even count conversions from various email campaigns.

So How Do I Tag My Google Analytics Campaign?

Google has a built-in URL builder worksheet that you can use to tag your campaigns, but for any large amount of links to be tagged they even recommend using a spreadsheet to create the same syntax. Well, I have built one already, and I’m willing to share! This past winter, I helped set up my first campaign for a not-for-profit’s conference, with over 120,000 site visits over the course of three months.

For our workflow, we used a collaborative Google Spreadsheet so that any member of the marketing team could tag their own URLs, whether it was the Marketing Manager for a big keynote announcement, or the Digital Communications Manager for a quick tweet. The sheet has five fields to enter text, including a URL and 4 content parameters. The last column simply concatenates each cell together–with the required character syntax in between–and we were able to quickly iterate tagging different messages for our campaign.

Click to view this free template that is publicly available, where you can copy the formulas and even the whole sheet if you’d like. Enjoy, and have fun splicing and dicing your data!

Google Analytics Campaign tagging Google Spreadsheet

Eyes On The Prize (No, Not To Maximize Shareholder Wealth)

Share Button

As a twenty-something trying to find his way in the world, I have been reading a book on work called “Every Good Endeavor,” by Timothy Keller.  The book talks a lot beyond the goals of individuals and building your career, and ultimately drives to the heart of why we’re organized to produce good: to serve the interests of a culture, and the sets of values surrounding that culture.  He warns, however:

“We should expect, then, that each culture’s emphases have some beneficial influences on work and yet at the same time harmfully distort it.”

When we drift away from what we are building and constructing–e.g. focusing simply on maximizing shareholder profits–we neglect the very value of what we are creating.


“For the love of money is the root of all evil.”

Think past the cliché for a brief moment, and think about the Great Recession on Wall Street.  Enron.  Watergate.  These were all efforts of individuals and organizations that were in their own right relatively successful, but over time as they started to push the boundaries of what they could extract from it personally, their schemes started to blow out of proportion because their constituents no longer were receiving the value that was once promised to them.

-Getting new Industry partners: why not simply show them where we’re at, and have them help accomplish our mission? Is it membership revenue?

Once you start heading towards the line, it’s hard to know when you cross it

Corruption is sneaky, because it’s a very subtle distortion of absolute truth.

So: Are You A Brand, Or Do You Sell Widgets?

Our post-industrial economy is moving past simply having the cheapest gadget or the most convenient location.  We are moving into an era of Seth Godin’s idea of tribes, where transparent values are what will connect companies’ products with their users.  This is the new value proposition.  “Here we are at the core, here’s how we’re similar, and here’s how we can help you come alive.”

KEEP VALUES (organizational as well as personal) IN VIEW AT ALL TIMES